Flat screen TV- Do you have one?

Talk about anything you want here.
{ESC}Lager
Administrator
Posts: 5312
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:21 pm

Hello everyone

Flat screens are very popular now and I was wondering which way some of you may have gone (LCD or Plasma), and why.

I'm trying to settle a debate and just wanted to get some input from our little gaming community.


Cheers, Lager

(next up: Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD)
Image
User avatar
LordGleedo
Posts: 2755
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Village Life, UK
Contact:

Got a 42" Panasonic plasma in the lounge, but its not great.

My housemate bought it, but should have got a pioneer INO, way better picture.

What size you thinking of buying??
{ESC}Lager
Administrator
Posts: 5312
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:21 pm

I'm not thinking of buying one, just trying to settle a disagreement at work.

Why do people buy what they do? Best picture, lowest price???
Image
User avatar
{ESC}Mikey
Server Engineer
Posts: 5403
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 pm
Location: Iowa USA
Contact:

I own a 32" LCD wide screen Samsung . I had to replace my RCA counsel :)

I picked LCD over Plasma for both price and longevity.
Both suffer short life span "as far as Brightness" The Plasma would have to be replaced, And I hope the LCD you would just have to replace the light.
If you are not dieing you are not playing
Image
Image
OMG PORN BANDITS
User avatar
AsToRoTh
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:09 pm
Location: Manchester UK
Contact:

k its a bit of a double edged sword afaik... LCD and Plasma both pretty much have comparable picture quality (especially when using HD). Plasma is probably slightly better IMO plus from my limited experience of LCD TVs Ive found the optimal viewing position is directly facing the screen. If you are off to one side the picture starts to darken the further your angle from the center. Personally I plumped for an LCD.. reason being the guys in the stores I spoke to all said that the plasma in the tv will have to be replaced roughly every 3-5 years.. the cost of which is pretty much equal to buying a new TV. Whereas an LCD should (in theory) last forever (or as long as the components inside last).. the only thing that can go wrong is the backlight... this is replaceable but the cost of doing so is basically a sliding scale... the more expensive the TV the more the parts tend to cost and despite what you may have been told cheaper doesnt necessarily mean badly built LoL. As far as the argument goes there really is no definitive answer unfortunately unless the debate is about value for money, in which case Id say the LCD is more economical (just my 2 cents tho ;) )
Image
***Someone stole my sig***
User avatar
LordGleedo
Posts: 2755
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Village Life, UK
Contact:

Yeah, wot he said :!: :takethat:
User avatar
{ESC}Mikey
Server Engineer
Posts: 5403
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 pm
Location: Iowa USA
Contact:

Yeah What AsToRoth said ;) :friends:
If you are not dieing you are not playing
Image
Image
OMG PORN BANDITS
{ESC}Chris
ESC Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 1:46 pm
Location: Birmingham
Contact:

my mom bought me a 19" lcd tv i use it for tv and my pc now
Image
******** ONE SHOT ONE KILL*********
User avatar
[PSI]Bal
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:08 pm

Gleedo is the panasonic perhaps a Viera?
User avatar
{ESC}BrassMonkey
ESC Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Location: Ellicott City, Maryland

I just got a 37" Toshiba lcd HD, really like it.
Image
Image
Post Reply